The cephalosporins structurally related to the penicillins consist of a -lactam ring attached to a dihydrothiazoline ring. Substitutions of chemical groups result in varying pharmacologic properties and antimicrobial activities. The mechanism of action of cephalosporins is analogous to that of the penicillins: (1) binding to specific penicillin-binding proteins, (2) inhibition of cell wall synthesis, and (3) activation of autolytic enzymes in the cell wall. Resistance to cephalosporins may be due to poor permeability of the drug into bacteria, lack of penicillin-binding proteins, or degradation by -lactamases.
Cephalosporins have been divided into five major groups or "generations" (see eTable 304.1) based on their antibacterial activity:
First-generation cephalosporins have good activity against aerobic
gram-positive organisms and some community-acquired gram-negative
organisms (P mirabilis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species);
second-generation drugs have a slightly extended spectrum against
gram-negative bacteria, and some are active against gram-negative
anaerobes; and third-generation cephalosporins are active against many
gram-negative bacteria. Not all cephalosporins fit neatly into this
grouping, and there are exceptions to the general characterization
of the drugs in the individual classes; however, the generational
classification of cephalosporins is useful for discussion purposes.
Cefepime is considered a fourth-generation agent because it is more stable
against plasmid-mediated -lactamase and has little
or no -lactamase-inducing capacity. Cefepime compares
favorably with ceftazidime with respect to its gram-negative activity;
however, its stability versus plasmid-mediated -lactamase
results in improved coverage against Enterobacter and Citrobacter species.
The gram-positive coverage of cefepime approaches that of cefotaxime
or ceftriaxone. None of the currently available agents are active
against the enterococcus. A fifth-generation cephalosporin, ceftaroline, is uniquely active against methicillin-resistant S aureus and has comparable gram-negative spectrum activity as third-generation agents. First-Generation Cephalosporins Antimicrobial Activity In vitro activity includes coverage of gram-positive cocci, including
viridans streptococci, group
A hemolytic streptococci, and S aureus. As with
all cephalosporins,
they are inactive against enterococci and methicillin-resistant
staphylococci. Activity against H influenzae is
poor, and penicillin-resistant streptococci (both intermediately
and highly resistant) are resistant to first-generation cephalosporins.
Among gram-negative bacteria, E coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae,
and P mirabilis are the most likely susceptible.
Anaerobic gram-positive cocci are usually susceptible, but B
fragilis is not. Pharmacokinetics & Administration Oral Cephalexin, cephradine, and cefadroxil are generally well absorbed.
Cefadroxil, because of its longer half-life, can be given twice
daily instead of four times daily. Intravenous Cefazolin is preferred because its longer half-life allows for
less frequent dosing. In kidney disease, it requires dosage adjustment. Intramuscular Cefazolin can be given intramuscularly; however, the intravenous
route is preferred because of the every 8-hour dosing schedule. Clinical Uses Oral drugs are used for treatment of urinary tract infections, and they can be used for minor skin and soft tissue infections (eg, cellulitis, soft tissue abscess). However, the increase in the incidence of community-associated methicillin-resistant S aureus has limited the use of these agents in some instances. Intravenous first-generation cephalosporins are the drugs of
choice for most clean surgical prophylaxis; however, institutions
with high rates of postoperative surgical site infection with methicillin-resistant
staphylococci should consider the use of other agents, such as vancomycin.
The second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin and cefotetan have
expanded anaerobic activity and are superior to first-generation
agents as prophylaxis for colorectal surgery or for hysterectomy. First-generation cephalosporins do not adequately penetrate into
cerebrospinal fluid and are less potent than second- and third-generation
agents and cannot be used to treat meningitis. Second-Generation Cephalosporins
Second-generation cephalosporins are a heterogeneous group with
marked individual differences in activity, pharmacokinetics, and
toxicity. In general, they are active against gram-negative organisms
inhibited by first-generation drugs, but they have an extended gram-negative coverage.
Indole-positive Proteus and Klebsiella (including
first-generation cephalosporin-resistant strains) as well as M
catarrhalis and Neisseria species are
usually sensitive. Cefuroxime is active against H influenzae,
including -lactamase-producing strains, but has
little activity against B
fragilis. In contrast, cefoxitin and cefotetan are active
against many strains of B fragilis. Against gram-positive organisms, second-generation
agents are generally less active than the first-generation cephalosporins
(cefuroxime is an exception). Second-generation agents have no activity
against P aeruginosa. Pharmacokinetics & Administration Oral Only cefaclor, cefuroxime axetil, and cefprozil can be given orally. Cefuroxime axetil is deesterified to cefuroxime after absorption. Its longer half-life permits twice-daily dosing, and absorption is enhanced when it is taken with food (as is not the case with many other oral antibiotics). Intravenous and Intramuscular Because of differences in drug half-life and protein binding, peak serum levels achieved and dosing intervals vary greatly for this group of drugs (see eTable 304.2). Drugs with shorter half-lives (cefoxitin) require more frequent dosing
than drugs with longer half-lives (eg, cefuroxime). Dosage adjustment
is required with kidney disease. Clinical Uses Because of their activity against -lactamaseproducing H
influenzae and M catarrhalis, cefprozil
and cefuroxime axetil have a role in the treatment of sinusitis
and otitis media in those patients unresponsive to amoxicillin. Because of their activity against B fragilis,
cefoxitin and cefotetan can be used to treat mixed anaerobic infections,
eg, peritonitis and diverticulitis. However, since many B
fragilis and enteric gram-negative organisms are resistant,
alternative agents are preferred for serious intra-abdominal
infections. Cefoxitin and cefotetan are useful as prophylaxis in
colorectal surgery, vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy, and appendectomy
due to their moderate to strong activity against B fragilis. Third-, Fourth-, & Fifth-Generation Cephalosporins Antimicrobial Activity Most of these drugs are active against staphylococci (not methicillin-resistant
strains) but less so than first-generation cephalosporins. Ceftazidime,
however, has notably weak activity against S aureus and
pneumococci. While inactive against enterococci, most third- and
fourth-generation cephalosporins inhibit most streptococci (ceftazidime is
an exception to this rule). Ceftriaxone and cefotaxime offer the
most reliable antipneumococcal coverage. A major advantage of these
cephalosporins is their expanded gram-negative coverage. In addition
to organisms inhibited by other cephalosporins, they are more
active against Serratia marcescens, Providencia,
Haemophilus, and Neisseria, including -lactamaseproducing
strains. Ceftazidime is unique among all third-generation agents because
it is active against P aeruginosa. Acinetobacter, Citrobacter,
Enterobacter, and nonaeruginosa strains of Pseudomonas are
variably sensitive to third-generation cephalosporins, and Listeria
is uniformly resistant. Activity against B fragilis is
variable. In contrast to the third-generation agents, cefepimethe
only currently available fourth-generation cephalosporinis
more active against Enterobacter and Citrobacter, has
activity comparable to that of ceftazidime against P aeruginosa,
and has gram-positive activity similar to that of ceftriaxone. Cefpodoxime proxetil, cefdinir, cefditoren pivoxil, cefixime,
and ceftibuten (the only oral agents in this group) are more active
than cefuroxime axetil against gram-negative pathogens. However,
none of these oral agents are equal to the parenteral third-generation
cephalosporins against these pathogens. All third-
and fourth-generation cephalosporins are uniformly active against Streptococcus
pyogenes (group A Streptococcus). Cefpodoxime
proxetil, cefditoren pivoxil, and cefdinir are active against methicillin-sensitive S
aureus, whereas ceftibuten has little activity (none are
active against methicillin-resistant strains). Cefdinir, cefditoren
pivoxil, and cefpodoxime proxetil are active against penicillin-sensitive
strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae (the pneumococcus),
but ceftibuten has marginal activity. None of the oral cephalosporins
are reliable against intermediately susceptible or penicillin-resistant S pneumoniae. Like
other members of this class, these drugs are ineffective against
enterococci and Listeria monocytogenes. The one available fifth-generation cephalosporin, ceftaroline, is unique in that it represents the only -lactam with in vitro activity against methicillin-resistant S aureus. Unlike other -lactams, ceftaroline binds PBP2a, a penicillin binding protein encoded by the mecA gene in methicillin-resistant S aureus. The spectrum of activity approximates that of ceftriaxone, thus it is inactive against P aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp, and B fragilis. Pharmacokinetics & Administration The intravenous third- and fourth-generation agents distribute into extracellular fluid and reach levels in the cerebrospinal fluid exceeding those needed to inhibit susceptible pathogens. At the present time, the cerebrospinal fluid penetration of ceftaroline is unknown. The half-lives of these drugs are
variable, resulting in differing dosage needs
(see eTable 304.2). Ceftriaxone is eliminated primarily by biliary
excretion, and no dosage adjustment is required in kidney disease.
The other drugs are eliminated primarily by the kidney and thus
require dosage adjustment in kidney disease. Clinical Uses Because of their penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid and
potent in vitro activity, intravenous third-generation cephalosporins
are useful to treat meningitis due to susceptible pneumococci, meningococci, H
influenzae, and susceptible enteric gram-negative rods.
In meningitis in older patients, third-generation cephalosporins
should be combined with ampicillin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole until L
monocytogenes has been excluded as the etiologic pathogen.
Ceftazidime has been used to treat meningitis due to Pseudomonas. The
dosage for meningitis should be at the upper limits of the recommended
range, because cerebrospinal fluid levels of these drugs are only
1020% of serum levels. Ceftazidime or cefepime
is frequently administered empirically in the febrile neutropenic
patient. Ceftriaxone is indicated for gonorrhea, chancroid, and more
serious forms of Lyme disease. Because of its long half-life and
once-daily dosing requirement, ceftriaxone is an attractive option
for the outpatient parenteral therapy of infections due to susceptible
organisms. Cefepime is useful for third-generation cephalosporinresistant
isolates such as Enterobacter and Citrobacter. While
cefepime has an extended spectrum of activity compared with third-generation
agents, a meta-analysis revealed increased all-cause mortality with
this agent when compared with other -lactams.
Additional analyses have refuted this finding, and cefepime appears no different than any other -lactam with respect to mortality risk. Considering its spectrum of activity, including methicillin-resistant S aureus, ceftaroline is useful in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infection due to this pathogen, particularly if gram-negative pathogens are coinfecting. Cefdinir, cefditoren pivoxil, and cefpodoxime proxetil are the best third-generation oral agents against pneumococci and S aureus. Cefixime is available in an oral suspension and 400-mg tablets. This latter dosage form is important because it is the only oral agent recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital or rectal gonorrhea. Of concern, cefixime-resistant gonorrhea has been isolated in the United States, potentially resulting in no active agents in the treatment of this sexually transmitted disease. Adverse Effects of Cephalosporins Allergy
Cephalosporins, like penicillins, are sensitizing, and a variety of hypersensitivity reactions occur, including anaphylaxis, fever, skin rashes, nephritis, and hemolytic anemia. The frequency of IgE cross-allergy between cephalosporins and penicillins approximates 5–10%. However, the risk of cross-reactivity is dependent on the specific cephalosporin. Cross reactivity between penicillin and cephalosporins is more common with first-generation agents, when compared with later generations. Persons with a history of anaphylaxis to penicillins should not receive cephalosporins. The likelihood of non–IgE-mediated cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins is unknown but likely very low. Allergies to a given agent may or may not extend to the entire cephalosporin class. Toxicity Ceftriaxone has been associated with a dose-dependent biliary
sludging syndrome and cholelithiasis due to precipitation of drug
when its solubility in bile is exceeded. Long-term administration
of 2 g/d or more is a risk factor for this complication.
Cefepime may be associated with an increased rate of neurotoxicity,
particularly with large doses and concomitant kidney disease. Ceftaroline fosamil (Teflaro)a new IV cephalosporin. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 2011 Jan 24;53(1356):5–6.
[PMID:
21252841]
| Corey GR et al. Integrated analysis of CANVAS 1 and 2: phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ceftaroline versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in complicated skin and skin-structure infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Sep 15;51(6):641–50.
[PMID: 20695801]
| Hasdenteufel F et al. Structure-activity relationships and drug allergy. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jan 25. [Epub ahead of print] [PMID: 22283609]
| Kim PW et al. Meta-analysis of a possible signal of increased mortality associated with cefepime use. Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Aug 15;51(4):381–9.
[PMID: 20624065]
|
|